The Secretary for Social Affairs and Culture is right. In terms of public tenders and direct adjudications for major building projects, Macau is a mess. It’s worth noting that in some cases the government decides to use direct adjudications for certain projects, particularly when it wants to ensure that buildings and infrastructure here are connected to some of the worlds biggest names in architecture. And Pritzker Prize winners are as recognized by the professionals themselves as famous as you can get. As Wikipedia puts it, simply, the Pritzker Architecture Prize is awarded annually to honor a living architect or architects whose built work demonstrates a combination of those qualities of talent, vision and commitment, which has produced consistent and significant contributions to humanity and the built environment through the art of architecture That is why everywhere in the world, cities choose names of reference to design important projects. From Philip Johnson in 1979 to I.M.Pei in 1983 who was invited to design Macaus Science Center to Oscar Niemeyer in 1988, responsible for building Brasilias Congress, in Brazil in 1960. Also Álvaro Siza Vieira in 1992 and the late Zaha Hadid in 2004. Her recent passing means the first female winner of the renowned prize will sadly not see her distinctive Macau project finished, the latest tower being added to Melco Crowns Entertainment City of Dreams. But for the citys international name and fame, the building will be here, forever connected to her. Its a mess, vents the Secretary. But it should not be. At least not when theres a political reason to adjudicate directly. It can be a mess when theres no political excuse, but that was not the case here. However it was on so many other occasions in the recent past. Other projects have been given directly to architects in the past, and nobody seemed to worry. Even when the architects were too close to the local political power circle, and ethics, morals and common sense should have advised for a public tender, still it was not done. And, again, nobody seemed to complain. Secretary Tam is right. This is a mess. And it is time to give transparency to these procedures once and for all. Hopefully, this case will do just that, helping our political decision makers and high level government officials. Because from now on we will all pay much more attention to the adjudication practices here and discuss the reasons behind future decisions.
Top Stories
RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR
【法律解碼】評估澳門《信託法》的進展:是否不負眾望?
第15/2022號法律(澳門《信託法》)於2022年12月1日正式生效。澳門自此成為葡語系首個設立在岸信託法的司法轄區,亦是繼《中華人民共和國信託法》、“台灣地區信託法”及《受託人條例(香港法例第29 章)》後,大中華地區第四部信託法。儘管澳門《信託法》至今已生效逾一年,但據了解,該法尚未得到有效實施,。因此有必要就當前的挑戰和未來的出路展開探討。
OPINION – Investing in Diversification!
As the lights of the Great Hall of the People in Beijing, where the “Two...